Villa Sanjomuromachi Kyoto

Reviews of Villa Sanjomuromachi Kyoto

Villa Sanjomuromachi Kyoto

Ennogyojacho 375, Nakagyo Ward, Kyoto City, Kyoto Prefecture, 604-8174, JapanSee Hotel Details
Villa Sanjomuromachi Kyoto
Villa Sanjomuromachi KyotoVilla Sanjomuromachi KyotoVilla Sanjomuromachi Kyoto
Choose dates to check available rooms
We Price Match
1 night

Guest Reviews

9.4/10
Amazing
42 Reviews
Verified reviews
Location9.5
Amenities9.5
Service9.0
Cleanliness9.5
Filter by:
Sort by:
All reviews(42)
Positive reviews(5)
Reviews with photos/video(1)
Negative reviews(1)
Denis Badin
Superior Double Room, 1 King Bed
Stay Date Sep 2024
Couples
6 Reviews
10.0/10
Outstanding
Posted on Oct 3, 2024
Super hotel! We even extended our stay and stayed in this hotel. I recommend
Show OriginalGoogle Translated
Guest User
Superior Double Room, 1 King Bed
Stay Date May 2024
Couples
3 Reviews
10.0/10
Outstanding
Posted on Jun 19, 2024
The service was great, the room was nice and surprisingly spacious. It's just that the front desk's English is really poor, hahahaha, but they are super enthusiastic and can communicate with a translator, which is very cute!
Show OriginalGoogle Translated
Guest User
Premium Double Room, 1 Queen Bed, Non Smoking, Balcony (Travelers'Choice Best of the Best 2020)
Stay Date Sep 2024
Solo travelers
11 Reviews
8.0/10
Very Good
Posted on Oct 27, 2024
Be careful, Chinese people are easily despised
Show OriginalGoogle Translated
Xiaokeaihenkuiwu
Superior Double Room, 1 King Bed
Stay Date Jul 2023
Travel with friends
22 Reviews
10.0/10
Outstanding
Posted on Sep 27, 2023
For the size of a hotel in Japan, this one is amazing! It's not small and clean, and the breakfast is delicious. You can also have breakfast at the bar downstairs! Service: Good, Japanese standard service Environment: The decoration is stylish and the environment is good Hygiene: Clean and tidy Facilities: Complete facilities
Show OriginalGoogle Translated
Guest User
Superior Double Room, 1 King Bed
Stay Date Nov 2023
Family
2 Reviews
2.0/10
Posted on Dec 27, 2023
Not cost-effective, very small
Show OriginalGoogle Translated